🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.